Abstract
Background: This study explores the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies within the South African public procurement system, addressing entrenched challenges such as fragmented processes, limited transparency and operational inefficiencies.
Objectives: This study examines how Industry 4.0 technologies can be strategically integrated into the South African public procurement system to enhance efficiency, transparency and accountability.
Method: The study followed a qualitative desktop research design which synthesises legal frameworks, policy documents and academic literature to assess how digital innovations, including artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, big data analytics, and cloud computing, can enable more accountable and efficient procurement practices.
Results: Findings indicate that these technologies, when strategically embedded across key supply chain management (SCM) elements, namely demand management, acquisition, sourcing and supplier selection, evaluation and adjudication of bids, contract performance monitoring, and risk management, enhance predictive planning, reduce procedural bottlenecks and reinforce integrity in public procurement.
Conclusion: The research demonstrates that digital enablement can reposition procurement from a compliance-driven function to a dynamic governance mechanism responsive to service delivery needs.
Contribution: The study recommends the formulation of a national digital procurement strategy, investment in secure and interoperable infrastructure, capacity development for procurement officials, and the piloting of digital platforms in high-expenditure sectors. Managerial implications include the need for institutional agility, cross-functional innovation and leadership commitment to digital transformation. Through the alignment of technological adoption with constitutional values and developmental priorities, public procurement can serve as a strategic lever for inclusive governance and systemic reform.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; Internet of Things; blockchain; big data; cloud computing; digital innovation; public procurement; Industry 4.0.
Introduction
Governments across the world have faced a unique interaction effect of inflationary pressure, historically low growth, deglobalisation, rising cost of living concerns, geopolitical confrontation, and rapidly accelerated degradation of the climate. These complexities demand more agile and modernised approaches to public governance. In this evolving context, Dyer (2024, p. 7) recognises the shift in public sector procurement from a predominantly transactional function to a strategic mechanism capable of delivering broad societal value. Although there were public procurement reforms in South Africa and multiple amendments to the secondary legislation, the system continues to experience systemic signs of corruption and political interference (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], 2024).
Public procurement in South Africa is governed by a robust yet complex legal infrastructure, anchored in Section 217 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) 1 of 1999, the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA) 5 of 2000 and the Preferential Procurement Regulations of 2022.
These frameworks aim to foster transparency, fairness, and value for money. However, traditional procurement processes continue to suffer from inefficiencies, opacity, and vulnerability to abuse.
Amid these challenges, the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) presents a profound opportunity to modernise public procurement. Technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, blockchain, machine learning, digital twins, big data, and artificial intelligence (AI) offer transformative capabilities. If strategically implemented, these digital tools can significantly enhance the efficiency, transparency and accountability of procurement processes (Mojaki et al., 2024).
Addressing the systemic issues is imperative to unlocking the full potential of digital procurement. Recent empirical studies indicate that digitalisation can mitigate procurement fraud and improve performance outcomes. However, widespread adoption remains constrained by institutional inertia and resource disparities. By strategically adopting Industry 4.0 technologies, South Africa stands poised to revolutionise its procurement landscape, thereby strengthening public service delivery, curbing procurement-related costs, and contributing meaningfully to inclusive economic development.
Problem statement
Despite ongoing public procurement reforms in South Africa driven by objectives such as improved governance, economic empowerment, and service delivery, the system continues to grapple with persistent structural and operational challenges. Manual procurement processes remain dominant, often leading to inefficiencies, delayed service delivery, fragmented departmental coordination, and an erosion of public trust. A recent assessment of South Africa’s procurement system, conducted through the internationally recognised Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS), uncovered several critical shortcomings. This report, developed collaboratively by the OECD, the World Bank, the African Development Bank, and the South African National Treasury (NT), highlights the following systemic issues:
- Fragmentation of e-procurement platforms because of poor vertical integration with other e-government systems.
- Insufficient market research and weak environmental considerations during the early procurement stages.
- Ongoing transparency deficits and inadequate capacity building, particularly in fostering stakeholder inclusivity.
- Limited mechanisms to detect and mitigate corruption, increasing exposure to procurement-related risks (OECD, 2024).
These findings align with parallel observations by the International Monetary Fund (IMF, 2023), which cited inconsistent procedural enforcement, lack of open contracting standards, and weak monitoring infrastructure as persistent barriers to efficient procurement. Furthermore, delays and irregularities in procurement cycles have undermined critical infrastructure delivery, with reports highlighting project stagnation and misaligned procurement decisions that prioritise price over technical merit (Engineering News, 2025). These operational setbacks underscore a misalignment between policy ambition and on-the-ground capability. Consequently, there is a pressing need to reimagine South Africa’s public procurement architecture, shifting from a fragmented, manual system to a digitally enabled, transparent, and strategically integrated framework. Industry 4.0 technologies provide the tools to enable this transformation, but systemic, regulatory, and institutional hurdles must be addressed to unlock their full potential.
Research methods and design
This study adopted a qualitative desktop research approach, relying on the systematic review and interpretation of secondary data to explore the intersection between Industry 4.0 technologies and South Africa’s public procurement landscape. The first phase of the methodology involved an in-depth analysis of key policy and legal documents that govern public procurement in the country. These included Section 217 of the Constitution, the PFMA, PPPFA, Public Procurement Regulations (PPR) 2022, as well as various instruction notes, implementation guidelines, and supply chain management (SCM) frameworks issued by the NT. The objective was to understand the legal and institutional architecture underpinning procurement operations and to identify regulatory gaps that may hinder digital transformation.
South Africa’s public procurement system is structured around key elements of SCM – as defined by the NT (2017) – demand management, acquisition management, logistics, disposal, and supply chain performance monitoring. To maintain thematic coherence, this study focuses on demand, acquisition, logistics, and performance management, deliberately excluding disposal. Additionally, logistics has been conceptually embedded into acquisition management to reflect its operational interdependence within procurement workflows. Supply chain performance management, traditionally centred on efficiency monitoring and service outcomes, has been expanded in this analysis to incorporate contract management, given its pivotal role in ensuring compliance, service quality, and the realisation of procurement value.
The second phase entailed a structured review of academic literature, technical reports, and global case studies related to digital procurement reform, e-government systems, and the capabilities of Industry 4.0 technologies such as AI, blockchain, the IoT, and big data analytics. Particular emphasis was placed on literature that assesses public procurement reforms in South Africa, comparative studies from international jurisdictions, and the potential of technological innovation to address procurement inefficiencies, corruption, and transparency deficits. This literature review provided the theoretical and empirical foundation necessary to frame the study’s analysis and inform subsequent recommendations.
Ethical considerations
Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from the North-West University, Economic and Management Sciences Research Ethics Committee (No. NWU/00656/24/A4).
Results
South African public procurement framework
Public procurement in South Africa functions as both a strategic governance instrument and an operational mechanism for advancing socio-economic transformation. As Ambe (2019, p. 656) asserts, procurement serves as a key policy tool, enabling the state to implement development priorities and redress historical inequalities. It is a multidimensional function encompassing planning, solicitation, contracting, execution, and oversight anchored firmly within the public policy domain (Fourie & Malan, 2020, p. 3). The constitutional foundation of public procurement is laid out in Section 217 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, which mandates that procurement systems must be designed to be fair, equitable, transparent, competitive, and cost-effective (Rebuplic of South Africa [RSA], 1996). The operationalisation of this mandate is guided by enabling legislation, most notably the PFMA of 1999, which tasks accounting officers and authorities with the responsibility of establishing procurement systems that comply with constitutional principles (RSA, 1999). In addition, the NT is constitutionally empowered to prescribe procurement regulations and frameworks that reinforce sound financial governance and institutional accountability.
The reform efforts initiated in the early 2000s sought to restructure public procurement as a lever for inclusive development, addressing the systemic imbalances inherited from apartheid-era policies (Thobakgale & Mokgopo, 2018, p. 41). These reforms introduced preferential procurement mechanisms and strengthened oversight frameworks, signalling a shift towards procurement as both a value-creation process and an ethical governance imperative. Despite the presence of a robust legal and policy architecture, challenges related to fragmentation, manual processing, and inconsistent compliance remain. The recent enactment of the Public Procurement Act (2024) reflects a renewed commitment to systemic reform, offering an opportunity to embed emerging technologies and promote strategic coherence across all tiers of government.
The South African public procurement system is governed by a robust constitutional and legislative framework designed to ensure fairness, transparency, competitiveness and cost-effectiveness. At its core is Section 217 of the Constitution, which mandates that all organs of state must contract for goods and services in a manner that is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive, and cost-effective. This constitutional imperative is operationalised through several key statutes and regulations:
- Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) 1 of 1999: Requires accounting officers to maintain procurement systems that uphold the five constitutional principles. It is supported by NT Regulations that guide implementation across national and provincial departments.
- Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA) 5 of 2000: Provides a framework for implementing preferential procurement policies aimed at redressing historical inequalities. It enables organs of state to advance previously disadvantaged individuals through targeted procurement practices.
- Public Procurement Act 28 of 2024: Recently signed into law, this Act consolidates and modernises procurement legislation. It aims to streamline procurement processes, enhance transparency, and combat corruption and state capture. It also introduces uniform norms and standards across all spheres of government, reinforcing expenditure control and ethical governance.
In addition to these legislative instruments, the South African public procurement system is guided by General Procurement Guidelines issued by the NT. These guidelines emphasise five pillars: value for money, open and effective competition, ethics and fair dealing, accountability and reporting, and equity (RSA, 2005). Together, they form the ethical and operational backbone of procurement practice. Despite this comprehensive framework, implementation challenges persist. Fragmentation across departments, limited digital integration, and capacity constraints continue to undermine procurement efficiency and integrity. The recent enactment of the Public Procurement Act signals a renewed commitment to reform, offering a timely opportunity to embed Industry 4.0 technologies into the procurement architecture.
Demand management
Demand management marks the first critical phase in the public procurement lifecycle, forming the foundation upon which procurement strategies and operational decisions are developed. It involves the systematic identification and analysis of organisational needs to inform sourcing, budgeting and planning activities (NT, 2017). According to Mathiba (2020, p. 648), procurement activities in government only commence once a defined need for a particular product or service has been established, highlighting the centrality of demand management in aligning procurement with service delivery goals. This process transcends mere administrative formality. As Mojaki and Chukwuere (2021, p. 14) assert, demand management within SCM represents a progression of cross-functional, strategic activities that are essential to achieving institutional objectives. Masete and Mafini (2018, p. 2) also emphasise its significance as the gateway to strategic procurement planning, underscoring the need for robust methods of needs appraisal, market analysis and operational alignment. The North West Provincial Government (NWPG, 2019) outlines a comprehensive approach to demand management that includes strategic and operational planning, commodity analysis, and integration of user requirements, all of which are vital to informed and effective procurement decisions.
The role of Industry 4.0 in demand management
With the advent of Industry 4.0, digital technologies have revolutionised demand management by offering data-driven insights and automation tools that strengthen forecasting and planning. Digital capabilities such as e-design tools enable procurement practitioners to articulate specifications that are tailored to evolving organisational and end-user needs (Madzimure et al., 2020, p. 3). The IoT plays a pivotal role by generating real-time, high-volume data streams from interconnected devices. These datasets support accurate, predictive analytics for demand forecasting and procurement planning (Allioui & Mourdi, 2023, p. 2). In a public procurement context, IoT can provide granular insights into consumption patterns, inventory levels and service requirements, enhancing responsiveness and reducing waste. On the other hand, big data technologies, as articulated by Althabatah et al. (2023, p. 2), facilitate large-scale data aggregation and pattern discovery, which are essential for accurate need identification and spending projections. In tandem, cloud-based platforms powered by machine learning algorithms enable automated analysis of transaction data, offering actionable intelligence on procurement cycles and market trends. Additionally, AI contributes through supplier performance analysis and value-creation potential. Andersson et al. (2025) argue that AI assists in ranking supplier capabilities, predicting supply chain bottlenecks and tailoring sourcing decisions. These functions are particularly beneficial in South African public procurement, where budget constraints and service demands necessitate precision in procurement planning. Therefore, this study posits that historical consumption data, frequency of demand, and budget forecasts represent essential inputs to effective demand management. Industry 4.0 technologies, when employed strategically, can synthesise these elements into reliable, forward-looking procurement strategies addressing inefficiencies and unlocking value at the earliest stages of the procurement cycle.
Acquisition management
Acquisition management in South Africa encompasses the entire tendering process from the publication of procurement opportunities via requests for quotation (RFQs) or requests for proposal or bids (RFPs or RFBs) through to the evaluation and eventual award of contracts (OECD, 2024; RSA, 2005). This stage is vital to ensuring that goods and services are procured in a manner that is fair, competitive, and aligned with legislative requirements and national objectives (RSA, 1996, 1999). Globally, there has been a notable shift towards digital tendering platforms, which aim to streamline acquisition procedures, reduce manual processing costs, and promote transparency (Sunmola & Shehu, 2020, p. 1586). These platforms improve auditability, enhance supplier engagement and significantly reduce turnaround times associated with traditional procurement cycles.
Integrating Industry 4.0 into acquisition processes
In the South African public procurement context, the adoption of digital tools within acquisition management remains uneven. However, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies has the potential to transform this space through automation, data-driven decision-making, and end-to-end digital traceability (Mojaki et al., 2024). Technologies such as blockchain can offer immutable records of tender submissions and bid evaluations, enhancing trust and reducing the risk of tampering. Likewise, AI-powered analytics can assist procurement officials in screening bidder eligibility, verifying compliance requirements and assessing historical performance. Bansal and Jain (2023, p. 2789) highlight that AI tools can also detect anomalies in bid pricing patterns and support the elimination of collusive tendering. Moreover, cloud-based platforms improve document management and inter-departmental coordination during the acquisition process (Mosweu et al., 2019, p. 2). They allow for real-time document sharing, automated updates on procurement milestones, and secure archiving of critical records, all of which support accountability and ease of oversight. Digital acquisition systems also enable automated notifications and deadline tracking, reducing human error and ensuring adherence to procurement timelines. These improvements not only lower administrative burdens but also enhance fairness and accessibility, particularly for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) often side-lined by complex manual processes (Althabatah et al., 2023). Ultimately, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into acquisition management has the potential to increase procurement speed, lower transaction costs, and reinforce legal compliance, making the tendering process more transparent, inclusive and developmentally responsive.
Sourcing and supplier selection
Sourcing and supplier selection are central to ensuring that public procurement promotes fairness, competitiveness, and optimal value for money. In the South African context, these processes are particularly vital given the constitutional directive under Section 217, which mandates that public procurement must be equitable, transparent, cost-effective and competitive. The NWPG (2019)’s emphasis on strategic sourcing highlights a paradigm shift moving away from merely transactional procurement towards creating value throughout the supply chain. Strategic sourcing prioritises efficiency, supplier diversity, sustainability and market responsiveness. However, achieving these goals requires robust tools for market intelligence, supplier evaluation and decision-making.
Industry 4.0 introduces a suite of technologies that transform the traditional sourcing process by enabling real-time data analysis, performance prediction and digital transparency. Big Data analytics is a critical enabler of strategic sourcing. As noted by Althabatah et al. (2023, p. 19), its application allows procurement entities to perform comprehensive spend analysis, evaluate supplier performance with greater accuracy, and develop intelligent negotiation strategies based on real-time insights. Furthermore, it facilitates data-driven decision-making in the selection of suppliers and the configuration of vendor portfolios, ensuring that sourcing choices are both responsive and strategically aligned (Rodrigues et al., 2021, p. 127). In parallel, AI tools assist procurement planners in tracking market trends, forecasting supplier risks and automating routine due diligence. Bansal and Jain (2023, p. 2789) note that AI platforms can consolidate supplier databases and offer real-time sourcing intelligence that enhances decision accuracy and turnaround time. The emergence of IoT further enhances supplier selection by embedding intelligent algorithms into supply chain monitoring systems (Sidek et al., 2022, p. 3). These algorithms help assess logistical reliability, delivery consistency and quality assurance, which are crucial to supplier scoring models (Althabatah et al., 2023, p. 19). Importantly, the adoption of these technologies can reinforce constitutional principles by minimising human bias, increasing supplier inclusivity particularly for Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs), and promoting cost-effectiveness through dynamic competition. While digital tools provide new sourcing capabilities, their successful integration requires a simultaneous focus on digital skills development, infrastructure investment, and ethical oversight to ensure that technological impartiality does not mask structural inequities.
Evaluation and adjudication of bids
The evaluation and adjudication of bids represent a pivotal phase in public procurement, one in which transparency, objectivity and compliance are most critical. In South Africa, this stage is often vulnerable to procedural inconsistencies, subjective judgement and manipulation of preset evaluation criteria. To counteract these risks and strengthen the integrity of decision-making, Industry 4.0 technologies offer promising interventions. Artificial intelligence has notably transformed evaluation processes across industries by enabling rapid assessment, consistency, and advanced data processing. According to Samuels (2025), the integration of AI into institutional processes yields significant improvements in operational efficiency, productivity and competitiveness. Within the procurement landscape, AI can automate the screening of bids, assess compliance against tender specifications, and apply weighted criteria with objectivity, thereby reducing human bias and expediting decision timelines. The IoT also contributes meaningfully by reducing manual intervention and enabling machine-to-machine communication that can validate data submissions in real-time. As Mostafa et al. (2019, p. 7) assert, IoT facilitates seamless data integration and enhances supply chain connectivity, ultimately leading to increased speed and accuracy in bid evaluations. Moreover, it underpins broader economic and social transformation by enabling smart systems that detect discrepancies and flag anomalies during evaluation. According to Althabatah et al. (2023), big data analytics further strengthens adjudication by allowing for the simultaneous analysis of extensive procurement datasets. This capability supports pattern recognition, supplier performance comparisons and red-flag identification based on historical contract data (Althabatah et al., 2023, p. 2). Evaluating bids based on such comprehensive and evidence-based insights fosters informed, defendable decisions. Additionally, AI applications such as digital signature authentication and one-click approvals introduce efficiencies that significantly reduce procedural bottlenecks. Bansal and Jain (2023, p. 2787) highlight that such technologies enhance traceability and compliance while also ensuring secure, tamper-proof approvals. This automation lends itself to shorter turnaround times and less susceptibility to manipulation or delays. Collectively, these technologies embed rigour, speed and accountability into the evaluation and adjudication process. When leveraged strategically, they not only protect procurement integrity but also build public trust in procurement outcomes.
Contract management
Contract management is a cornerstone of effective public procurement, governing the terms, expectations, and enforcement mechanisms that define the relationship between buyer and supplier. In South Africa, this stage often faces challenges such as poorly drafted contracts, delivery disputes, performance shortfalls, and, in some cases, unethical manipulation of contractual terms (Manyathi et al., 2021, p. 6). It is clear that these issues contribute to contract mismatches, sub-standard service delivery, and financial irregularities in the procurement process. The Industry 4.0 offers innovative solutions to address these shortcomings particularly through the use of blockchain technology, smart contracts and real-time monitoring systems (Sibanda et al., 2024, p. 3). Correspondingly, Hasan et al. (2021, p. 151947) report that blockchain platforms allow for the encoding of contract terms into smart contracts, which automatically execute predefined actions when specific conditions are met. These contracts ensure that all stakeholders are bound transparently to agreed-upon obligations by eliminating the need for third-party enforcement. Althabatah et al. (2023, p. 19) emphasise the key advantages of smart contracts: immutability, automatic execution and resistance to tampering. These attributes drastically reduce the potential for influence peddling or unethical interference during the contract implementation phase. Moreover, blockchain’s distributed architecture ensures transparency across stakeholders, reinforcing accountability and auditability. Additionally, cloud-based platforms offer scalable storage and seamless document accessibility, enhancing contract traceability and version control (Khan et al., 2023, p. 6). Real-time collaboration tools can flag inconsistencies and notify parties of contractual milestones, reducing administrative burden and legal disputes. The role of IoT technologies in contract management is equally transformative. Internet of Things sensors can track the usage, condition, or delivery status of procured assets in real time, providing predictive alerts for replenishment or maintenance needs (Lampropoulos et al., 2019). This functionality helps prevent service disruptions and supports proactive decision-making by both public buyers and suppliers (Ben-Daya et al., 2019, p. 4720). Furthermore, fraud detection applications inspired by IoT architecture such as those used in financial systems (Baghel et al., 2023, p. 74) can be adapted to identify anomalies during contract execution. This enhances public sector integrity by flagging irregularities such as false delivery confirmations or duplicate invoicing. Taken together, these technologies transform contract management from a reactive, paper-driven process to a digitally-enabled, data-informed and self-enforcing mechanism. The resulting improvements in transparency, compliance and oversight hold significant promise for building trust and efficiency in South African public procurement.
Contract performance monitoring and compliance
Effective performance monitoring is essential to ensuring that contracted service providers deliver on agreed terms, timeframes and quality standards. In South Africa, however, this phase is often undermined by limited monitoring capacity, poor data visibility, and delayed reporting, leading to unexplained project variations, extensions, and irregular expenditure (Manyathi et al., 2021, p. 6). Without robust oversight mechanisms, contracts become vulnerable to non-compliance, financial mismanagement, and erosion of public trust. Digital technologies associated with Industry 4.0 offer transformative solutions to these challenges. According to Madzimure et al. (2020, p. 3), digital platforms enhance performance management by facilitating cost tracking, delay identification, adaptability, and service traceability. They help contract managers assess whether service providers meet performance indicators while also allowing real-time visibility into contract milestones and deviations.
Artificial intelligence strengthens this capability by automating compliance checks and generating alerts based on performance thresholds. As noted by Bansal and Jain (2023, p. 2789), AI-enabled systems can track service-level agreements (SLAs) and flag instances of underperformance and contractual non-compliance, empowering managers to respond proactively and avoid costly project disruptions. Furthermore, Sidek et al. (2022, p. 4) posit that the IoT adds another layer of sophistication by embedding sensors into assets and service environments to facilitate real-time monitoring of deliveries, usage, and infrastructure conditions. This not only enables predictive maintenance and inventory alerts but also ensures that contract terms such as quantity, frequency and quality are verifiably met without manual oversight (Maepa et al., 2023, p. 3). Furthermore, cloud-based performance dashboards and automated workflows support coordinated contract reviews, audit trails and historical trend analysis (Mosweu et al., 2019, p. 4). Therefore, it can be argued that these tools reduce the likelihood of contract lapses and misinterpretation by preserving transparent records and allowing multi-level access for stakeholders involved in monitoring and oversight. In the South African context, where irregularities often emerge during implementation stages, these technologies can serve as watchdogs of procurement integrity, instilling real-time visibility and proactive decision-making into the contract performance landscape.
Supply chain risk management and internal control
Effective risk management is an indispensable pillar of public procurement, especially in environments marked by economic volatility, institutional complexity, and governance vulnerabilities. In South Africa, the procurement system has often been exposed to procurement fraud, systemic inefficiencies, and reactive rather than pre-emptive risk mitigation. As Mhelembe and Mafini (2019, p. 3) observe, supply chain risks frequently stem from operational vulnerabilities that could be minimised through proactive planning, continuous monitoring, and institutional agility. Industry 4.0 technologies offer robust capabilities to identify, assess and respond to these procurement risks in real time. Artificial Intelligence-powered systems, for instance, can analyse historical procurement patterns to detect anomalies and anticipate irregularities. These tools support the early identification of corruption risks, supplier defaults, or procedural violations, reducing the likelihood of reactive crisis management and ensuring alignment with service delivery expectations (Bansal & Jain, 2023, p. 2787). Blockchain technology plays an instrumental role in strengthening internal controls. Its immutable ledger and transparent record-keeping features create a tamper-resistant audit trail of transactions, contract changes and financial flows. This not only safeguards against document fraud and unauthorised amendments but also bolsters external audit compliance and public accountability (Althabatah et al., 2023, p. 27). The IoT also contributes to risk mitigation by tracking logistical processes, monitoring asset integrity and generating usage alerts. These sensors can provide real-time data on inventory levels, delivery timelines, and asset movement, helping procurement managers respond swiftly to emerging disruptions or fraud indicators. Moreover, Manyathi et al. (2021, p. 8) emphasise that successful supply chain risk management entails continuous observation, justification of acceptable risk levels, and the development of resilient procurement ecosystems. The integration of Industry 4.0 tools makes these practices actionable by embedding intelligence across the procurement value chain. Collectively, these technologies shift risk management from a static compliance function to an active, data-informed control system. They empower the public sector to move beyond reactive troubleshooting towards a governance model characterised by visibility, automation, and institutional confidence. In the evolving terrain of South African public procurement, managing supply chain risks and reinforcing internal controls have become imperative amid growing exposure to corruption, inefficiency, and service disruption. Traditional compliance-based approaches have proved insufficient in anticipating or mitigating emerging threats. However, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies offers a proactive shift in risk management philosophy. Artificial intelligence enables early detection of irregularities and facilitates predictive analysis of supplier behaviour and procedural anomalies (Bansal & Jain, 2023, p. 2787). Blockchain provides tamper-resistant audit trails that enhance transparency and accountability, while the IoT supports real-time monitoring of logistics, asset movement, and inventory levels, creating early alerts for potential fraud or disruption (Althabatah et al., 2023, p. 27; Ben-Daya et al., 2019, p. 4719). These digital tools converge to form a responsive, intelligence-driven control environment that not only deters procurement malpractice but also fortifies institutional resilience in the face of systemic vulnerabilities.
Discussion
The analysis reveals a compelling case for the digital transformation of the South African public procurement system, particularly through the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies. While the legislative and policy framework is well-established, its implementation remains hampered by manual processes, fragmentation, and limited digital capacity. The juxtaposition of persistent governance challenges such as corruption, inefficiency, and procurement opacity with the transformative capabilities of technologies like AI, IoT, blockchain, and big data marks a critical inflection point for systemic reform.
One of the key themes emerging from the study is the mismatch between strategic intent and operational capability. Despite policy commitments to transparency and accountability, the MAPS assessment and supporting literature underscore that these values are often compromised by legacy systems, weak oversight, and insufficient integration of digital tools. Industry 4.0 technologies offer not just technical upgrades but institutional leverage, the ability to create procurement ecosystems that are intelligent, adaptive and fraud-resistant. Another significant insight is the role of data as infrastructure. From demand forecasting to contract performance, data flows fuel the entire procurement lifecycle. Technologies that enable real-time analytics, anomaly detection, and predictive modelling not only enhance planning and decision-making but shift procurement from reactive administration to proactive governance. In this light, digital infrastructure is not a luxury but a prerequisite for value-driven procurement.
However, the study also highlights the preconditions for successful digital adoption, namely investment in infrastructure, development of digital skills among procurement professionals, cybersecurity safeguards, and regulatory alignment. In the absence of these enablers, technologies may be underutilised or misapplied thereby entrenching existing problems rather than solving them. Finally, the research suggests that South Africa need not start from scratch. There are global case studies from various countries such as Germany, China, Japan, France, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Korea, India and Malaysia (to mention a few) that demonstrate practical pathways to digital procurement reform (Rodrigues et al., 2021, p. 127–130). Contextualising these best practices through a uniquely South African lens rooted in constitutional mandates and development imperatives can accelerate transformation while maintaining inclusivity and public trust.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study, the following strategic recommendations are proposed to facilitate the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into the South African public procurement system through the implementation of the following strategies:
Development of a national digital procurement strategy
The state should initiate a coherent and coordinated national strategy that outlines the vision, milestones and standards for digital procurement transformation. This strategy must align with Section 217 of the Constitution, support inclusive economic participation, and be guided by principles of transparency, accountability, and efficiency.
Investment in infrastructure and interoperable systems
The South African government must prioritise the modernisation of Information Communication Technology (ICT) infrastructure across national, provincial and municipal levels. This includes developing secure, interoperable e-procurement platforms that are integrated with financial management systems and accessible to all tiers of government.
Building the digital skills and change management capacity
A targeted programme for training and upskilling procurement officials in digital literacy, AI ethics, cybersecurity, and data analytics should be implemented. Change management support is crucial to overcome resistance and foster a culture of innovation within procurement environments.
Strengthening of cybersecurity and digital governance
Robust safeguards must be established to protect procurement systems from cyber threats and data breaches. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to accommodate blockchain, digital signatures, cloud storage, and smart contracts, ensuring legal clarity and ethical use of AI.
Piloting and scaling digital procurement innovations
Pilot projects, particularly in high-expenditure sectors such as infrastructure, health, and education, should be launched to test digital solutions. Lessons learnt can then inform national rollouts, supported by adaptive policy feedback mechanisms and stakeholder engagement.
Fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration
Collaboration between government, academia, civil society, and the private tech sector is essential to generate innovative ideas, share expertise, and promote public trust. These partnerships can support co-design, open data initiatives, and benchmarking against global best practices.
Institutionalise continuous learning and research
A digital procurement innovation hub and knowledge centres should be established to monitor global trends, conduct impact assessments, and support evidence-based policymaking. Ongoing research should also explore issues of digital equity, ethics, and sustainability in procurement.
Conclusion
The evolving complexity of the South African public procurement landscape, defined by legislative ambition, yet marked by operational fragmentation, presents a critical opportunity for transformation. This study has demonstrated that the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies is not merely a technological upgrade but a potential catalyst for systemic reform, capable of addressing long-standing inefficiencies, enhancing transparency, and fortifying accountability across the procurement lifecycle. From demand management and acquisition to supplier selection, adjudication, and contract enforcement, digital tools such as AI, the IoT, big data analytics, blockchain, and cloud platforms offer unprecedented capabilities. Their implementation promises more than cost efficiencies – it enables procurement systems to become adaptive, intelligent and anticipatory. The convergence of these tools when strategically mapped across procurement stages creates a digital ecosystem that supports proactive governance, deters corruption and elevates public trust.
However, the journey towards digitally enabled procurement is not without hurdles. Realising these gains will require bold policy leadership, sustained investment in infrastructure and capacity building, regulatory agility, and a culture of innovation within public institutions in South Africa. Furthermore, there is a pressing need to ensure that digital transformation is inclusive, empowering procurement practitioners, protecting vulnerable suppliers, and aligning technological adoption with constitutional values and development imperatives. As South Africa navigates its path towards procurement modernisation, the findings of this study underscore one essential truth: that is, the future of public procurement lies not only in what is procured, but in how it is procured. In conclusion, the South African state can reposition procurement as a strategic lever for integrity, service excellence, and sustainable development by embracing the transformative potential of Industry 4.0 technologies.
Acknowledgements
This article is based on research originally conducted as part of Lawrence M. Mojaki’s doctoral thesis entitled ‘Developing a digital procurement framework based on Industry 4.0 technologies for the public sector in South Africa’ submitted to the Department of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University Business School, South Africa in 2024. The thesis was supervised by Nkanyiso K. Ndlovu. The original thesis is currently unpublished and was not publicly available online at the time of publishing this article.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
CRediT authorship contribution
Lawrence M. Mojaki: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Nkanyiso K. Ndlovu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. All authors reviewed the article, contributed to the discussion of results, approved the final version for submission and publication, and take responsibility for the integrity of its findings.
Funding information
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available because of reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author, Lawrence M. Mojaki, upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings and content.
References
Allioui, H., & Mourdi, Y. (2023). Exploring the full potentials of IoT for better financial growth and stability: A comprehensive survey. Sensors, 23(19), 8015. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198015
Althabatah, A., Yaqot, M., Menezes, B., & Kerbache, L. (2023). Transformative procurement trends: Integrating industry 4.0 technologies for enhanced procurement processes. Logistics, 7(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7030063.
Ambe, I.M. (2019). The role of public procurement to socio-economic development. International Journal of Procurement Management, 12(6), 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2019.102934
Andersson, P.E., Arbin, K., & Rosenqvist, C. (2025). Assessing the value of artificial intelligence (AI) in governmental public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 25(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-05-2024-0057
Baghel, K., Dwivedi, S.K., & Singh, R. (2023). Security credit card transactions: Leveraging IoT for fraud detection. International Journal of Progressing Research Engineering Management and Sciences (IJPREMS), 3(6), 74–76.
Bansal, S., & Jain, N. (2023). A Study on the impact of artificial intelligence techniques in enhancing electronic public procurement system. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(6), 2787–2793.
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019). Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15–16), 4719–4742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140
Dyer, S. (2024). Business case for public prcurement professionalisation. Australasian Procurement & Construction Council (APCC).
Engineering News. (2025). Creramer media’s engineering news. Retrieved from https://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/procurement-woes-stall-south-africas-infrastructure-progress-2025-06-27.
Fourie, D., & Malan, C. (2020). Public procurement in the South African economy: Addressing systemic issues. Sustainability, 12, 8692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208692
Hasan, H., Salah, K., Jayaraman, R., Yaqoob, I., Omar, M., & Ellahham, S. (2021). Blockchain-enabled telehealth services using smart contracts. IEEE Access, 9, 151944–151959. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3126025
Khan, Y., Su’ud, M.B., Alam, M.M., Ahmad, S.F., Ahmad, A.B., & Khan, N. (2023). Application of internet of things (IoT) in sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability, 15(694), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010694
Lampropoulos, G., Siakas, K., & Anastasiadis, T. (2019). Internet of Things in the context of Industry 4.0: An overview. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 1(7), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v7i1.84
Madzimure, J., Mafini, C., & Dhurup, M. (2020). E-procurement, supplier integration and supply chain performance in small and medium enterprises in South Africa. South African Journal of Business Management, 51(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v51i1.1838
Maepa, D.N., Mpwanya, M.F., & Phume, T.B. (2023). Readiness factors affecting e-procurement in South African government departments. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 17, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v17i0.874
Manyathi, S., Burger, A., & Moritmer, N. (2021). Public sector procurement: A private sector procurement perspective for improved service delivery. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v9i1.521
Masete, M., & Mafini, C. (2018). Internal barriers to supply chain management implementation in a South African traditional university. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v12i0.389
Mathiba, G. (2020). Corruption, public sector procurement and COVID-19 in South Africa: Negotiating the new normal. Journal of Public Administration, 55(4), 642–661.
Mhelembe, K., & Mafini, C. (2019). Modelling the link between supply chain risk, flexibility and performance in the public sector. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v22i1.2368
Mojaki, L.M., & Chukwuere, J.E. (2021). An evaluation of selected supply chain management element in department of community safety and transport management in Mahikeng. Holistica Journal of Business and Public Administration, 12(3), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2021-0020
Mojaki, L.M., Tuyikeze, T., & Ndlovu, N.K. (2024). A digital procurement framework for South African public sector: A content analysis approach. South African Journal of Information Management, 26(1), a1871. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v26i1.1871.
Mostafa, N., Hamdy, W., & Alawady, H. (2019). Impact of Internet of Things on supply chains: A framework for warehousing. Social Sciences, 8(84), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8030084
Mosweu, T., Luthuli, L., & Mosweu, O. (2019). Implications of cloud-computing services in records management in Africa: Achilles heels of the digital era. South African Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.1069
National Treasury (NT). (2017). Preferential procurement regulations of 2017. South African National Treasury.
North West Provincial Government (NWPG). (2019). Provincial SCM blueprint. NWPG.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Assessment of South Africa’s public procurement system. MAPS, OECD.
Rebuplic of South Africa (RSA). (2005). Treasury regulation for departments, trading entities, constitutional institutions and public entities. National Treasury.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act No 108 of 1996. Government Printing Works.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (1999). Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), No 1 of 1999. Government Printing Works.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (2000). Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA), No 5 of 2000. Government Printing Works.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (2024). Public Procurement, Act No 28 of 2024. Government gazette. Government Printing Works.
Rodrigues, T.V., Filho, V.H., Pontes, J., De Resende, L.M., & Yoshino, R.T. (2021). Government initiatives 4.0: A comparison between industrial innovation policies for Indutry 4.0. Revista Gestão E Desenvolvimento, 18(1), 120–147. https://doi.org/10.25112/rgd.v18i1.2411
Samuels, A. (2025). Examining the integration of artificial intelligence in supply chain management from Industry 4.0 to 6.0: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1477044. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1477044.
Sibanda, B., Basheka, B., & Van Romburgh, J. (2024). Assessing the readiness of the South African public sector to embrace blockchain technologgy: Factors for successful adoption. Journal of the British Blockchain Association, 7(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-7-2-(1)2024
Sidek, N., Ali, N., & Alkawsi, G. (2022). An intergrated success model of internet of things (IoT)- based services in facilities management for public sector. Sensors, 22(3207), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093207
Simone, A., & Balasundharam, V. (2023). Public Procurement in South Africa: Issues and Reform Options, Selected Issues Papers 2023 (Vol. 041, pp. 15). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400244339.018
Sunmola, F.T., & Shehu, Y.U. (2020). A case study on performance of electronic tendering systems. In 30th international conference of flexible automation and intelligent manufacturing (FAIM2021) (vol. 51, pp. 1586–1591). 15–18 June 2021. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.221
Thobakgale, M.P., & Mokgopo, T.I. (2018). Public procurment and South Africa’s 1996 constitution: Panacea for combating corruption? Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 13(1), 41–54.
|
Hide
Show all
Email this article (Login required)
